|
Structured Academic Controversy is introduced to be a type of cooperative learning strategy where controversial issues are learnt and discussed from multiple perspectives by small teams of students. It is a technique and a way discovered and designed especially for students to get engaged in a controversy and then guide them to seek consensus. Students in such teams learn about opinions and views of other people as well as put forth theirs and attempt to agree politely with what they are convinced and also try to convince people to what they disagree without hurting sentiments of the opponent teams. All in all it is a smart way of a revolution in the world of Academics to begin with a new era of a world we live today. ==General Protocol for Cooperative Group Strategies for Structured Academic Controversy== * Form cooperative teams of 3- 4. * Define the issue or problem and identify the two positions. * Assign each team a unique position, if possible. * Each team researches their position and articulates the main ideas and details. * Questions go back and forth among the teams. * Each team switches perspectives, summarizes the others' positions. * All teams come together to state a consensus position, based on information and perspectives of each team. * Each individual writes a justified personal opinion as to which position to support. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Structured academy controversy」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|